Free Essays on Criminology

The way â€Å"Classical Criminology† was viewed was that if the punishment was of public notice they were scaring the people from committing crimes. Beccaria believed that people wanted to commit crimes but wanted to avoid being tortured. He felt that criminals received some type of thrill and pleasure while committing the crime. The criminal thought that the thrill he received while committing the crime, was well worth the torture he or she would receive if he were caught. Criminals did not think of the outcome at the time of the act, only once he or she was caught would they think of what is about to happen. I believe that â€Å"Classical Criminology† and â€Å"Positivism’s† would have to difficult to compare, because classical states that they like the thrill they receive while committing the crime and the punishment is worth all that pain they will receive if their caught, but if you look at it like this, if they don’t get caught they have received the pleasure of their life and will eventually continue till they get caught because it’s a easy way of life. Positivism’s say that the feature on a person can tell us that they are criminals, how? It might be the genes from their parents or other family members in the past. I would have to disagree on this theory. Just because my grandparents were criminals, I have to be a criminal no! Society and current events in a family can help change a person’s future, this is why it’s important for each generation of children to try to better it s family circle. I would go with Durkheim. Everyone is different and we would definite have a boring society if everyone went around with white collar image, and law enforcement agencies wouldn’t have a job to do.... Free Essays on Criminology Free Essays on Criminology The Code of King Hammauabi of Babylon, the Fourteenth Century B.C.’s Hittite Code, Draconian Code of Athens, and the Roman Law of the Twelve Tablets are past laws which have made the foundation for the death penalty, one of America’s most controversial issues today. Murder has been found to be the top reason why most inmates find themselves on death row now. However dating back to the time of King Hammauabi there have been twenty-five out of the two-hundred and forty-nine known codes where death is the punishment. Through-out the past thousands of years there has been significant revisions done to criminal law and the punishments that fit each crime. The death penalty as a punishment for murder can be dated further back in time to Biblical times. According to Kerby Anderson, author of the essay Capital Punishment, in Genesis the Bible states that â€Å"whoever sheds man’s blood, by man shall be shed, for in the image of God He made man.† Here it is clearly stated that the death penalty for murder was an accepted practice. It is even shown that God felt that certain punishment was deemed necessary for different crimes. â€Å"God destroyed two cities because of the heinous sin of the inhabitants.† Anderson also identifies how the Mosaic Law â€Å"set forth numerous offenses that were punishable by death. The first was murder.† Anderson also gives a strong argument against Christians who feel that â€Å"capital punishment does not apply to the New Testament and church age.† He finds that Romans 13: 1-7 â€Å"teaches that human government is ordained by God and that the civil magistrate is the minister of God.† According to Michael H. Reggio author of History of the Death Penalty, â€Å"Jews used many different techniques including stoning, hanging, beheading, crucifixion, throwing the criminal from a rock, and sawing asunder,† for various crimes. It took, however, almost three hundred years after the death of Christ before... Free Essays on Criminology The way â€Å"Classical Criminology† was viewed was that if the punishment was of public notice they were scaring the people from committing crimes. Beccaria believed that people wanted to commit crimes but wanted to avoid being tortured. He felt that criminals received some type of thrill and pleasure while committing the crime. The criminal thought that the thrill he received while committing the crime, was well worth the torture he or she would receive if he were caught. Criminals did not think of the outcome at the time of the act, only once he or she was caught would they think of what is about to happen. I believe that â€Å"Classical Criminology† and â€Å"Positivism’s† would have to difficult to compare, because classical states that they like the thrill they receive while committing the crime and the punishment is worth all that pain they will receive if their caught, but if you look at it like this, if they don’t get caught they have received the pleasure of their life and will eventually continue till they get caught because it’s a easy way of life. Positivism’s say that the feature on a person can tell us that they are criminals, how? It might be the genes from their parents or other family members in the past. I would have to disagree on this theory. Just because my grandparents were criminals, I have to be a criminal no! Society and current events in a family can help change a person’s future, this is why it’s important for each generation of children to try to better it s family circle. I would go with Durkheim. Everyone is different and we would definite have a boring society if everyone went around with white collar image, and law enforcement agencies wouldn’t have a job to do....